![]() |
||||
|
The author explores the use of different types of biorationals, a revolutionary new class of pest control for the ornamental crops market. by MICHAEL BROWNBRIDGE SEVERAL new pest control products have been recently registered for use on ornamentals and more should appear on the market in the next few years. Many of these products are classified as "biorational" or "reduced-risk" pesticides. What Are Biorationals? Unlike conventional synthetic pesticides, which are classified
on the basis of their chemistry, biorational pesticides are grouped on
the basis of some shared characteristics. For example, they pose minimal
to no risk to the environment due to their chemical make-up, rapid degradation,
or the small amounts required to effect control. These pesticides are
safe to applicators and are compatible with biological controls due to
their selective or short Biorational products include insect growth regulators (synthetic or botanically derived), oils, soaps, many of the new products with novel chemistries, microbially-derived products, and living microbes such as fungi and bacteria. The way a product is formulated and applied can also affect its classification as a biorational. Marathon, for example, may be regarded as a biorational due to its granule formulation and method of application, which prevents direct contact with beneficials and poses reduced risks to applicators. But it's not compatible with many natural enemies, including predators and hymenopteran parasitoids, so it doesn't fit the full biorational profile. Using Biorationals Biorationals can't be used the same way as traditional means because most of them are not cheap. Secondly, unlike the older synthetic insecticides, many biorationals have narrower spectra of activity, minimal to no residual activity, or short persistence. Many are active only after contacting the target pest. Therefore, it is critical to use them properly to make them cost- and pest-effective. It is imperative to use biorationals within an integrated
pest management (PM) program to ensure the correct selection of the most
appropriate product according to the pest species, the developmental stage(s)
being targeted, and optimal timing and placement of an application. Most
Some products also need to be used on an "in-first" basis. The biofungicides RootShield and PlantShield serve to illustrate this point well. These products need to be applied before diseases invade plant tissues. The fungus used in these preparations, Trichoderma harziunum T-22, helps block the entry of plant pathogens into the plant tissues by colonizing niches on the root, stem or leaf surface, which are preferred sites of infection for these pathogens. The fungus can also actively attack and kill invading pathogens. Rhapsody, which is based on the bacterium Bacillus subtilis, has a similar mode of action. But it is a preventative, not curative, biocontrol product. Understanding how your control tools work and what they can do, or perhaps more importantly what they can't do, is critical to their successful use. Early pest detection is vital, therefore a strategy to prevent populations getting out of control can be implemented as soon as possible. Consider the rapid potential for thrips' and aphids' population growth and spread if allowed to go unchecked. Aphids can spread approximately 120 square feet per day in a chrysanthemum crop. Correct identification of the pest is key to the selection of the best product for its control. Nicotinoid, Marathon or other systemic insecticides, and Flagship work well against piercing and sucking in-sects like aphids and whiteflies, but not U-trips. Endeavor, which is also a systemic but with a completely different and new chemistry, works well against aphids, but not so well against whiteflies. The IGRs Distance and buprofezin work well against whiteflies, but not against aphids. Conserve has excellent efficacy against thrips, caterpillar pests, and leaf miners, but does not work against aphids and whiteflies. Many of these new products have a much more restricted spectrum of activity than their predecessors. It is no longer a case of one-stop shopping for all your insecticide needs. Product selections need to be made carefully, according to the target pest and your own experience with that pest. Learning from other growers, extension specialists, meetings, and trade magazine articles can also help guide this choice. Also, be sure to read the label for proper usage. Targeting Pests Targeting a developmental stage is also an important consideration in product selection. Some materials work as adulticides, ovicides, or larvicides. Because mixed-age populations are usually present, use products that will control different stages in the initial phases of a management program to obtain better early control of the whole population. However, it is unlikely total control of all developmental stages will be achieved, therefore follow-up monitoring is essential to determine efficacy and the need to re-treat. With the exception of systemic products mentioned earlier, or those with some translaminar activity such as Distance or the miticide Pylon, using good spray techniques to obtain thorough coverage of infested foliage is essential because many biorational must contact the pest directly to be effective. The short residual activity of many biorationals also makes it imperative to efficiently target the pest. One of the main reasons many products fail is because they either do not reach the target pest or quantities reaching the pest are too low. Placing water- or oil-sensitive spray cards throughout a crop will provide an instant record of where sprays have reached. When used consistently this technique can lead to the adoption of better spray practices, more efficient use of resources, and ultimately superior levels of pest control. Applying Biorationals Spray equipment also needs to be properly maintained to obtain the type of coverage required. Certain types of spray equipment are more suitable for biorationals than others. For example, when applying fungicides, we have generally obtained superior levels of insect control using high-volume, "wet" sprays in the greenhouse compared to most low-volume sprays. When considering application, you must also consider where the pest is found and target sprays accordingly. For example, whiteflies can infest the underside of poinsettia leaves, so un-less you are using a systemic or translaminar product, this is where sprays must be placed.
Reapplication Given the limited range of activity, persistence, and residual
activity of many of these products, reapplications are often required
to suppress an infestation over a growing season. This raises two important
issues. Firs when should you re-apply? Regular scouting and record-keeping
after spraying will provide valuable information on how well a treatment
has performed, and when another application needs to be made, optimizing
the treatment timing. Secondly, what should you use for the second treatment?
For products such as soaps and oils, repeated applications may be problematic
because of the build-up of spray residues on the The IGR buprofezin has been used successfully control whiteflies in Europe for many years, and was the weapon of choice in many programs because of its compatibility with natural enemies. Unfortunately, many whitefly populations in Europe are now resistant to this product, making buprofezin no longer a valid control option in many countries. If ever there has been a lesson that we frequently ignore, it is that insects will become resistant, and resistance will develop more rapidly the more often we use the same product. It is essential to treat these new products with care, to ensure their prolonged usefulness in the greenhouse. To accomplish this, use pesticide rotations that incorporate different classes of insecticides with different modes of action. Mixing Biorationals Tank-mixing some products such as soaps, oils, or neem-based products with other insecticides is beneficial against certain pests. But because environmental factors and varietal and plant growth stage may affect phytotoxic expression, phytotoxicity should be assessed before treating large numbers of plants. For fungal products such as BotaniGard, Mycotech's reference data sheets show compatibility with most biorational insecticides like Azatin, Avid, soaps, oils, and IGRs. There is also considerable compatibility with chemical fungicides, and tank-mixing is possible with biorational fungicides such as Phyton 27 and Cleary's 3336. Fungal use may be integrated with many other products, but applications need to be made several days before or after fungicides have been used. Fungicides are also compatible with most predators and parasitoids, although the oils used in the emulsifiable formulations are initially repellent to some natural enemies such as whitefly parasitoids. Thus, formulation choice is important, depending on the crop, pest, and overall crop management program. The biofungicide RootShield also has proven to be compatible with many fungicides, insecticides, and growth regulators, and to date appears to have no adverse effects on natural enemies. Bacillus thuringiensis (e.g., Gnatrol and Dipel) is compatible with most crop protection products, and has few or no adverse effects against a range of predators and parasitoids. Nematodes, which are primarily used for fungus gnat control, are also very compatible with biorational pesticides. Biorationals And Beneficials Compared to traditional pesticides, biorationals are generally much "softer" on natural enemies. Soaps, horticultural oils, and IGRs may have some negative impact on beneficials when applied as foliar sprays that directly contact the natural enemy, but these effects are short-lived due to their limited residual activity. Koppert's adult Macrolophus, Encarsia, and Diglyphus are susceptible to neem products, and bees may be adversely affected. Neem products may be safe for Orius, Aphidius, and predatory mites. Similarly, there has been considerable debate about the safety of Conserve for natural enemies, which in itself highlights some of the difficulties associated with trying to assess compatibility. In general, when spray residues are dry there is a high degree of compatibility with honey bees and bumble bees, predatory bugs such as Orius, ladybeetles, and lacewings. Effects on predatory mites are less clear but appear to be more chronic, which can reduce longevity and fecundity, and adversely affect establishment. Parasitic wasps are very sensitive and releases must be
timed to prevent direct exposure to high levels on treated plants. Avid
is very harmful to some predators and parasitoids, al-though Koppert has compiled what is probably the best source of information on compatibility. This publication is in English and Dutch, with up-to-date in-formation available at ww.koppert.nl. Biorational Availability While alluding to many products in this article, the main
purpose has been Pest Control Of The Future Applied correctly, biorationals can provide excellent control of pests and diseases, and have a host of other positive attributes that surely make them the weapons of choice for the future. If not used properly or wisely, then control will be poor, and we will see many of the problems associated with the older-generation pesticides emerging. Knowledge and product must be used together to make the right decisions and to obtain the high levels of control required in greenhouse crop production. Biorationals and IPM Here are some considerations when incorporating biorationals
into a spray program: About the author: Michael Brownbridge is a professor of entomology, University of Vermont, Entomology Research Laboratory, Burlington, VT 054054400. Many thanks to Dick Lindquist Ohio State University), Dan Gilrein (Cornell Extension), and John Sanderson (Cornell University) for information on existing and upcoming biorational insecticides. Mention of a product in this article does not represent an endorsement by the author or the University of Vermont.
|
||||